The sceptical optimist : why technology isn't the answer to everything / Nicholas Agar.
Publisher: Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2015Edition: First EditionDescription: x, 206 pages ; 23 cmContent type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9780198717058 (hbk.)
- 0198717059 (hbk.)
- 303.483 23
- T14.5 .A33 2015
- T14.5 .A33 2015
Item type | Current library | Shelving location | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Book | NMC Library | Stacks | T14.5 .A33 2015 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 33039001384006 |
Browsing NMC Library shelves, Shelving location: Stacks Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
T14 .G47 2017 Thinking about technology : how the technological mind misreads reality / | T14 .H2855 2009 Mind, machine and morality : toward a philosophy of human-technology symbiosis / | T14 .P28 1999 Meaning in technology / | T14.5 .A33 2015 The sceptical optimist : why technology isn't the answer to everything / | T14.5 .B745 2018 New dark age : technology, knowledge and the end of the future / | T14.5 .B77 2015 Enjoying machines / | T14.5 .C374 2014 The glass cage : automation and us / |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 196-204) and index.
The rapid developments in technologies - especially computing and the advent of many 'smart' devices, as well as rapid and perpetual communication via the Internet - has led to a frequently voiced view which Nicholas Agar describes as 'radical optimism'. Radical optimists claim that accelerating technical progress will soon end poverty, disease, and ignorance, and improve our happiness and well-being. Agar disputes the claim that technological progress will automatically produce great improvements in subjective well-being. He argues that radical optimism 'assigns to technological progress an undeserved pre-eminence among all the goals pursued by our civilization'. Instead, Agar uses the most recent psychological studies about human perceptions of well-being to create a realistic model of the impact technology will have. Although he accepts that technological advance does produce benefits, he insists that these are significantly less than those proposed by the radical optimists, and aspects of such progress can also pose a threat to values such as social justice and our relationship with nature, while problems such as poverty cannot be understood in technological terms. He concludes by arguing that a more realistic assessment of the benefits that technological advance can bring will allow us to better manage its risks in future.
There are no comments on this title.