NMC Library

How we teach science : (Record no. 236937)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03414cam a2200349 i 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ocm1057242343
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OCoLC
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20210129114002.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180814t20192019maua b 001 0 eng c
010 ## - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CONTROL NUMBER
LC control number 2018037906
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9780674919341
Qualifying information hardcover
-- alkaline paper
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 0674919343
Qualifying information hardcover
-- alkaline paper
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (OCoLC)1057242343
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency MH/DLC
Language of cataloging eng
Description conventions rda
Transcribing agency DLC
Modifying agency OCLCO
-- YDX
-- OCLCF
-- BDX
-- HLS
-- YDX
-- L2U
-- YUS
-- UtOrBLW
-- MiTN
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code pcc
043 ## - GEOGRAPHIC AREA CODE
Geographic area code n-us---
050 00 - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER
Classification number Q183.3. A1
Item number R828 2019
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Rudolph, John L.,
Dates associated with a name 1964-
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title How we teach science :
Remainder of title what's changed, and why it matters /
Statement of responsibility, etc. John L. Rudolph.
264 #1 - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture Cambridge, Massachusetts :
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer Harvard University Press,
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice 2019.
264 #4 - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice ©2019.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 308 pages :
Other physical details illustrations ;
Dimensions 25 cm.
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Content type term text
Content type code txt
Source rdacontent.
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Media type term unmediated
Media type code n
Source rdamedia.
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Carrier type term volume
Carrier type code nc
Source rdacarrier.
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc. note Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE
Formatted contents note From textbook to laboratory -- The laboratory in practice -- Student interest and the new movement -- The scientific method -- Problems and projects -- The war on method -- Origins of inquiry -- Scientists in the classroom -- Project 2061 and the nature of science -- Science in the standards era.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The science taught in high schools-Newton's theory of universal gravitation, basic structure of the atom, cell division, DNA replication-is accepted as the way nature works. What is puzzling is how this precisely specified knowledge could come from an intellectual process-the scientific method-that has been incredibly difficult to describe or characterize with any precision. Philosophers, sociologists, and scientists have weighed in on how science operates without arriving at any consensus. Despite this confusion, the scientific method has been one of the highest priorities of science teaching in the United States over the past 150 years. Everyone agrees that high school students and the public more generally should understand the process of science, if only we could determine exactly what it is. From the rise of the laboratory method in the late nineteenth century, through the "five step" method, to the present day, John Rudolph tracks the changing attitudes, methods, and impacts of science education. Of particular interest is the interplay between various stakeholders: students, school systems, government bodies, the professional science community, and broader culture itself. Rudolph demonstrates specifically how the changing depictions of the processes of science have been bent to different social purposes in various historical periods. In some eras, learning about the process of science was thought to contribute to the intellectual and moral improvement of the individual, while in others it was seen as a way to minimize public involvement (or interference) in institutional science. Rudolph ultimately shows that how we teach the methodologies of science matters a great deal, especially in our current era, where the legitimacy of science is increasingly under attack.--
Assigning source Provided by publisher.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Science
General subdivision Study and teaching (Secondary)
Geographic subdivision United States
General subdivision History.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Science
General subdivision Methodology
-- Study and teaching (Secondary)
Geographic subdivision United States
General subdivision History.
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Education
General subdivision Social aspects
Geographic subdivision United States
General subdivision History.
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Date last checked out Copy number Koha item type
    Library of Congress Classification     Stacks 01/29/2021 1 Q183.3. A1 R828 2019 33039001494565 08/14/2023 02/01/2021 1 Book

Powered by Koha