000			02055cam a2200373 i 4500
001			2012007501
003			DLC
005			20190729104916.0
008			120221s2012 enk b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2012007501
020			_a9780521195362 (hardback)
020			_a9780521148795 (paperback)
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dDLC
042			_apcc
049			_aEY8Z
050	0	0	_aBF341 _b.G56 2012
082	0	0	_a155.7 _223
084			_aPSY039000 _2bisacsh
100	1		_aGoldhaber, Dale.
245	1	4	_aThe nature-nurture debates : _bbridging the gap / _cDale Goldhaber, University of Vermont.
264		1	_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2012.
300			_ax, 178 pages ; _c23 cm
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _2rdacarrier
520			_a"It's really incredible when you think about it. Here we are well into the 21st century and we are still fighting over the role of nature and nurture in human development. And it isn't even a new fight, it's not even a twentieth century fight, it actually goes back to the nineteenth century and probably even before that. So why is it that we can't get this question answered and move on to a new one? Is it because we haven't yet gotten the necessary data to make a conclusion one way or the other? Do we not yet have a powerful enough computer to sort everything out? Have we not identified the best method and statistics to collect and analysis the relevant data? One answer to these questions is of course "yes" to all these possibilities but there is also another possibility. It may also be that we are having trouble coming up with the answer because we continue to ask the wrong question"-- _cProvided by publisher.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [163]-176) and index.
650		0	_aNature and nurture.
650		7	_aPSYCHOLOGY / Developmental / General. _2bisacsh
948			_au362060
949			_aBF341 .G56 2012 _wLC _c1 _hEY8Z _i33039001265858
596			_a1
903			_a23863
999			_c23863 _d23863